Top 3 AI Coins of The First Week Of March 2025

Nasdaq acquires LeveL Markets: what it says about tokenized assets

Nasdaq’s purchase of LeveL Markets suggests that major financial firms are taking tokenized and “always-on” markets more seriously. Traditional market infrastructure is edging closer to blockchain based trading. The shift is unfinished. Still, digital assets are showing up in ordinary market plans instead of being parked in a separate experiment. My take: that change matters more than the headline itself.

Nasdaq said it will take full ownership of LeveL Markets, the third largest alternative trading system (ATS) in the US by trading volume. Nasdaq first invested in the company in 2021. LeveL now processes hundreds of millions of shares each day for more than 2,500 buy side and sell side clients. Its average daily trading volume rose 56% in 2025. The platform executes trades in more than 7,000 symbols daily for over 300 institutional buy side firms. Those are not startup-scale numbers.

Nasdaq plans to place LeveL’s institutional execution network inside its new Digital Liquidity Networks unit. Roland Chai leads the unit and has directed Nasdaq’s digital asset strategy since earlier this year. The group combines liquidity platforms with tokenization tools and digital asset technology. Put plainly, Nasdaq is building around a bet: traditional securities and blockchain based assets may eventually use some of the same market infrastructure. That bet is not a guarantee.

Nasdaq’s earlier moves point in the same direction. In September 2025, the company proposed allowing tokenized securities to trade on its exchange. An updated SEC filing in January 2026 described plans for eligible stocks and exchange traded products to trade in tokenized form alongside conventional shares. The Depository Trust Company would handle tokenization and blockchain settlement through a three year pilot program.

In March, Nasdaq also partnered with Kraken and tokenization company Backed to develop infrastructure linking traditional equities with blockchain networks. These are deliberate steps. Most commentary treats them as evidence of an imminent takeover by tokenized markets. That’s only half right. I would read them as preparation, not proof that tokenized markets are about to replace existing ones.

Why does this matter to crypto investors? Because institutional adoption depends on plumbing. Large financial firms are moving beyond small trials and working on systems to issue, trade, and settle tokenized assets. If institutional investors become more comfortable with those systems, more money could enter digital asset markets. That outcome remains uncertain. Even so, the line between traditional finance and crypto is getting harder to draw.

Other exchanges are also examining longer trading hours and tokenized securities. Cboe and the London Stock Exchange have similar plans. The New York Stock Exchange is developing a separate platform for 24/7 trading and onchain settlement of tokenized securities. The SEC has scheduled a September 17 roundtable on moving toward 24 hour US equity trading. Former SEC Chair Paul Atkins described the change this way: “We are moving towards a new day and night in the US equity markets.”

Regulatory attention does not settle the legal questions. It does show that policymakers are taking the subject seriously. The market data is moving as well. RWA.xyz reports that tokenized equities have grown more than sixfold in the past year, with distributed value rising from about $381 million in August 2025 to nearly $2.5 billion today.

That is still tiny beside conventional equities, so “exploded” would oversell it. The growth is real. It gives blockchain infrastructure companies something measurable to build for. Ethereum and its native token, ETH, could benefit if the network becomes a settlement layer for these products. Could that happen? Yes. Is it an investment conclusion? No.

What this means

Nasdaq’s acquisition suggests that institutional blockchain work is moving beyond small trials and into existing market systems. It also gives traditional finance its own version of the “always-on” trading model that crypto markets have used for years. Longer trading hours and faster settlement are plausible outcomes. New liquidity sources are another. Whether any of this works at scale will depend on regulation, demand, and the technology.

For crypto investors, infrastructure is the key issue. As more exchanges and financial firms develop tokenized securities, demand may grow for platforms that issue, trade, and settle real world assets. Ethereum and other layer 1 networks could become part of that process if institutions choose to use them. They could also be bypassed. Counter to the usual crypto pitch, a blockchain is not automatically the winner just because tokenization expands.

Regulation is the part I would watch most closely. The SEC’s September 17 roundtable covers 24 hour trading, but it does not explain how tokenized stocks and exchange traded products will be treated under securities law. Nasdaq’s future filings should offer more detail about its pilot programs, custody arrangements, and settlement process. I’ll be honest: those details are less exciting than the acquisition, but they will decide whether the model survives contact with regulators.

Clear approvals would remove some uncertainty for exchanges and financial institutions. They could also help companies building around real world asset tokenization. Investors should keep the scale in view. The tokenized equities market is near $2.5 billion, which is meaningful growth but still modest beside the wider stock market. Is that overkill as a caution? For a market measured in billions beside conventional equities, no.

If the figure keeps rising, it will be stronger evidence of lasting demand rather than a short burst of interest. Yes, that sounds less dramatic than the Nasdaq headline. It is also the more useful test. We tried enthusiasm before. It broke when adoption had to become infrastructure.