Latest

Unions drag US Treasury to court for giving Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E read-only access to data

Unions drag US Treasury to court for giving Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E read-only access to data

A powerful group of unions has declared war on the US Treasury Department, filing a lawsuit to stop Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E) from accessing sensitive financial and personal information yesterday.

The unions want an immediate court order slamming the brakes on Elon’s access to federal payment systems, saying the Treasury illegally handed Elon’s team the keys to the nation’s confidential data, including records tied to taxpayers, federal employees, and companies.

The lawsuit was filed after Scott Bessent, who now heads the Treasury, approved the access, which the unions are saying violates federal privacy protections and places all Americans at risk. In the lawsuit, they demand that any data already collected by D.O.G.E be retrieved and locked away for good.

Elon’s team has been on a mission to sniff out waste in government spending and drag federal tech systems into the 21st century ever since President Donald Trump signed an executive order for D.O.G.E on Jan. 22nd.

Treasury payment systems at the center of controversy

According to the union’s lawsuit, those systems process more than 1.2 billion federal transactions annually, covering everything from Social Security benefits to Medicare payments and defense contracts.

The complaint claims that Elon’s access was granted just after David Lebryk, Treasury’s acting Deputy Secretary, suddenly quit after working in the Treasury for years, helping oversee its payment processes. The unions are using his departure as evidence that something isn’t right.

“Our members’ privacy is being violated, and once that damage is done, you can’t undo it,” their court filing said. Treasury officials aren’t exactly scrambling to apologize. In fact, they’re defending the decision, claiming Elon’s team only has “read-only” access to “coded data.”

According to a report from Fox Business, a Treasury spokesperson told Congress that the access is necessary for operational reviews but won’t impact payments or give D.O.G.E control over the system. “No valid payment requests have been blocked or delayed,” they said.

Congress demands answers on Elon’s growing power

Democrats in Congress, led by Senator Patty Murray, are coming down hard on the Treasury for letting Elon’s hands anywhere near government finances. “Why should we believe them when Elon is bragging on X (formerly Twitter) that D.O.G.E could shut down payments to organizations he doesn’t like?” Murray asked.

She was referring to Elon’s online posts suggesting that D.O.G.E could halt payments to a Lutheran charity if it wanted to. Treasury’s defense? Tom Krause, the CEO of Cloud Software Group and a key member of D.O.G.E, is working as a special government employee under less strict ethical guidelines than full-time federal employees.

Treasury Secretary Bessent says Krause’s role is standard and involves reviewing payment systems to make them more efficient. “He has read-only access, similar to external auditors,” the Treasury’s statement reads.

Rep. Maxwell Frost took it further by showing up at the Treasury, demanding the same access Elon’s team got. “We’re here on behalf of our constituents,” Frost posted on X. “Let us in.” His stunt didn’t work. Steven Cheung, White House communications director, mocked him in fact, calling him “just another example of Democrats chasing social media clout instead of solving problems.”

Latest

Astarter & Kuant: AI-Powered PerpDEX for On-Chain Trading

Astarter and Kuant Team Up to Build AI-Powered PerpDEX for On-Chain Trading

Astarter, an AI agent infrastructure platform, announced a partnership with Kuant, an AI-focused GameFi project, to build an AI-powered perpetual decentralized exchange layer on-chain. Astarter posted the update on X on June 10, 2026. Big claim. Thin details. My take: the pitch is still clear enough. Put AI agents closer to DeFi derivatives and test whether perpetual trading can become less manual, less clunky, and maybe more efficient with capital.

Astarter & Kuant: AI-Powered PerpDEX for On-Chain Trading

The teams plan to connect AI infrastructure with perpetual trading networks, somewhere between DeFi derivatives and GameFi. Astarter says its role is tied to its Web4 AI ecosystem infrastructure and turning research into usable products. Kuant will work on trading mechanics that can react to fast crypto market conditions. Sounds useful, if it ships. Most AI-in-DeFi announcements say the same thing in softer language. That is only half reassuring. The real question is whether this becomes agent-assisted strategy tuning and trade execution, or just another DEX screen with “AI” stapled to the header.

Crypto loves a story. AI is one. DeFi derivatives are another. Put the two together and people pay attention before the product has earned it. Tokens such as Render (RNDR) and Fetch.ai (FET) saw strong demand earlier this year, while Bitcoin (BTC) spent weeks trying to break through the $61.4K area. Derivatives already make up a large share of crypto trading, with billions of dollars moving through the sector on busy days. Why does this matter? Because Astarter and Kuant are not selling a small UI tweak; they are aiming at one of crypto’s busiest trading lanes. Easy market hook. Harder product test.

AI agents inside a PerpDEX could matter if they make complex strategies easier to run, check, pause, and adjust. That is the test. Institutions do not avoid DeFi only because the interfaces are rough. They avoid it because risk controls, liquidity, custody, and governance can get messy quickly. Counter to the usual advice, “better automation” is not automatically better infrastructure. An AI-powered system might help, but serious money will need to understand what it is doing. Spot Bitcoin ETFs showed what can happen when crypto gets a cleaner access point: billions came in, and BTC moved above $73K in March 2024. This Astarter-Kuant deal is not that kind of event. Not even close. Still, it points at the same pressure in the market: people want crypto tools that feel less improvised.

Kuant describes the partnership as part of a broader push to mix GameFi experiments with trading infrastructure built for larger pools of capital. The teams say they want AI-led infrastructure to change how derivatives markets work on-chain. That could mean new ways for users to take part in DeFi networks. It could also mean agent branding wrapped around familiar perp mechanics. I’ll be honest: I would want to see the product before buying the bigger story. The teams also mentioned possible work with decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePINs) and AI agent networks, which could expand the platform if those integrations are real and not just roadmap haze.

From research to landing, from Meme to permanent–

We are honored to be a strategic partner of @Kuant_exchange to jointly build an AI-enhanced next-generation on-chain derivatives layer.

More information about the integration of [cooperation function name] will be announced… https://t.co/YVeaiAfYN5

— Astarter (@AstarterDefiHub) June 10, 2026

What this means

This partnership comes down to one practical question: can AI agents make on-chain derivatives easier to use without creating fresh failure points? If yes, traders could get better strategy automation, cleaner risk tools, tighter monitoring, and more ways to manage perp exposure. The downside is just as clear. Automated trading systems can hide risk until the market moves hard, and crypto markets have a habit of moving hard at the worst time. Is this overkill for a PerpDEX announcement? No, because the whole value claim depends on trust under pressure. For now, the first effects should stay inside the Astarter and Kuant ecosystems. If they show real volume, derivatives protocols such as GMX or dYdX may need stronger automation features of their own.

Next, watch for specifics. The X post still includes a placeholder for the “cooperation function name,” which does not exactly inspire confidence. Yes, this slightly contradicts the clean “AI infrastructure” framing above, but bear with me: unfinished announcement language often tells you where the product still is. The market will want details on the AI models, trading strategies, risk controls, and launch timing. Pilot results would matter. Early trading volume on the PerpDEX layer would matter too. Traders will probably track AI infrastructure tokens and DeFi derivatives names around each update, because that is how this market works. I would pay closest attention to public access dates and working integrations. Announcements are easy. A live product with users is harder.