Latest

Unions drag US Treasury to court for giving Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E read-only access to data

Unions drag US Treasury to court for giving Elon Musk’s D.O.G.E read-only access to data

A powerful group of unions has declared war on the US Treasury Department, filing a lawsuit to stop Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E) from accessing sensitive financial and personal information yesterday.

The unions want an immediate court order slamming the brakes on Elon’s access to federal payment systems, saying the Treasury illegally handed Elon’s team the keys to the nation’s confidential data, including records tied to taxpayers, federal employees, and companies.

The lawsuit was filed after Scott Bessent, who now heads the Treasury, approved the access, which the unions are saying violates federal privacy protections and places all Americans at risk. In the lawsuit, they demand that any data already collected by D.O.G.E be retrieved and locked away for good.

Elon’s team has been on a mission to sniff out waste in government spending and drag federal tech systems into the 21st century ever since President Donald Trump signed an executive order for D.O.G.E on Jan. 22nd.

Treasury payment systems at the center of controversy

According to the union’s lawsuit, those systems process more than 1.2 billion federal transactions annually, covering everything from Social Security benefits to Medicare payments and defense contracts.

The complaint claims that Elon’s access was granted just after David Lebryk, Treasury’s acting Deputy Secretary, suddenly quit after working in the Treasury for years, helping oversee its payment processes. The unions are using his departure as evidence that something isn’t right.

“Our members’ privacy is being violated, and once that damage is done, you can’t undo it,” their court filing said. Treasury officials aren’t exactly scrambling to apologize. In fact, they’re defending the decision, claiming Elon’s team only has “read-only” access to “coded data.”

According to a report from Fox Business, a Treasury spokesperson told Congress that the access is necessary for operational reviews but won’t impact payments or give D.O.G.E control over the system. “No valid payment requests have been blocked or delayed,” they said.

Congress demands answers on Elon’s growing power

Democrats in Congress, led by Senator Patty Murray, are coming down hard on the Treasury for letting Elon’s hands anywhere near government finances. “Why should we believe them when Elon is bragging on X (formerly Twitter) that D.O.G.E could shut down payments to organizations he doesn’t like?” Murray asked.

She was referring to Elon’s online posts suggesting that D.O.G.E could halt payments to a Lutheran charity if it wanted to. Treasury’s defense? Tom Krause, the CEO of Cloud Software Group and a key member of D.O.G.E, is working as a special government employee under less strict ethical guidelines than full-time federal employees.

Treasury Secretary Bessent says Krause’s role is standard and involves reviewing payment systems to make them more efficient. “He has read-only access, similar to external auditors,” the Treasury’s statement reads.

Rep. Maxwell Frost took it further by showing up at the Treasury, demanding the same access Elon’s team got. “We’re here on behalf of our constituents,” Frost posted on X. “Let us in.” His stunt didn’t work. Steven Cheung, White House communications director, mocked him in fact, calling him “just another example of Democrats chasing social media clout instead of solving problems.”

Latest

Nasdaq to Acquire LeveL Markets: Always-On Trading Future

Nasdaq acquires LeveL Markets: what it says about tokenized assets

Nasdaq’s purchase of LeveL Markets suggests that major financial firms are taking tokenized and “always-on” markets more seriously. Traditional market infrastructure is edging closer to blockchain based trading. The shift is unfinished. Still, digital assets are showing up in ordinary market plans instead of being parked in a separate experiment. My take: that change matters more than the headline itself.

Nasdaq to Acquire LeveL Markets: Always-On Trading Future

Nasdaq said it will take full ownership of LeveL Markets, the third largest alternative trading system (ATS) in the US by trading volume. Nasdaq first invested in the company in 2021. LeveL now processes hundreds of millions of shares each day for more than 2,500 buy side and sell side clients. Its average daily trading volume rose 56% in 2025. The platform executes trades in more than 7,000 symbols daily for over 300 institutional buy side firms. Those are not startup-scale numbers.

Nasdaq plans to place LeveL’s institutional execution network inside its new Digital Liquidity Networks unit. Roland Chai leads the unit and has directed Nasdaq’s digital asset strategy since earlier this year. The group combines liquidity platforms with tokenization tools and digital asset technology. Put plainly, Nasdaq is building around a bet: traditional securities and blockchain based assets may eventually use some of the same market infrastructure. That bet is not a guarantee.

Nasdaq’s earlier moves point in the same direction. In September 2025, the company proposed allowing tokenized securities to trade on its exchange. An updated SEC filing in January 2026 described plans for eligible stocks and exchange traded products to trade in tokenized form alongside conventional shares. The Depository Trust Company would handle tokenization and blockchain settlement through a three year pilot program.

In March, Nasdaq also partnered with Kraken and tokenization company Backed to develop infrastructure linking traditional equities with blockchain networks. These are deliberate steps. Most commentary treats them as evidence of an imminent takeover by tokenized markets. That’s only half right. I would read them as preparation, not proof that tokenized markets are about to replace existing ones.

Why does this matter to crypto investors? Because institutional adoption depends on plumbing. Large financial firms are moving beyond small trials and working on systems to issue, trade, and settle tokenized assets. If institutional investors become more comfortable with those systems, more money could enter digital asset markets. That outcome remains uncertain. Even so, the line between traditional finance and crypto is getting harder to draw.

Other exchanges are also examining longer trading hours and tokenized securities. Cboe and the London Stock Exchange have similar plans. The New York Stock Exchange is developing a separate platform for 24/7 trading and onchain settlement of tokenized securities. The SEC has scheduled a September 17 roundtable on moving toward 24 hour US equity trading. Former SEC Chair Paul Atkins described the change this way: “We are moving towards a new day and night in the US equity markets.”

Regulatory attention does not settle the legal questions. It does show that policymakers are taking the subject seriously. The market data is moving as well. RWA.xyz reports that tokenized equities have grown more than sixfold in the past year, with distributed value rising from about $381 million in August 2025 to nearly $2.5 billion today.

That is still tiny beside conventional equities, so “exploded” would oversell it. The growth is real. It gives blockchain infrastructure companies something measurable to build for. Ethereum and its native token, ETH, could benefit if the network becomes a settlement layer for these products. Could that happen? Yes. Is it an investment conclusion? No.

What this means

Nasdaq’s acquisition suggests that institutional blockchain work is moving beyond small trials and into existing market systems. It also gives traditional finance its own version of the “always-on” trading model that crypto markets have used for years. Longer trading hours and faster settlement are plausible outcomes. New liquidity sources are another. Whether any of this works at scale will depend on regulation, demand, and the technology.

For crypto investors, infrastructure is the key issue. As more exchanges and financial firms develop tokenized securities, demand may grow for platforms that issue, trade, and settle real world assets. Ethereum and other layer 1 networks could become part of that process if institutions choose to use them. They could also be bypassed. Counter to the usual crypto pitch, a blockchain is not automatically the winner just because tokenization expands.

Regulation is the part I would watch most closely. The SEC’s September 17 roundtable covers 24 hour trading, but it does not explain how tokenized stocks and exchange traded products will be treated under securities law. Nasdaq’s future filings should offer more detail about its pilot programs, custody arrangements, and settlement process. I’ll be honest: those details are less exciting than the acquisition, but they will decide whether the model survives contact with regulators.

Clear approvals would remove some uncertainty for exchanges and financial institutions. They could also help companies building around real world asset tokenization. Investors should keep the scale in view. The tokenized equities market is near $2.5 billion, which is meaningful growth but still modest beside the wider stock market. Is that overkill as a caution? For a market measured in billions beside conventional equities, no.

If the figure keeps rising, it will be stronger evidence of lasting demand rather than a short burst of interest. Yes, that sounds less dramatic than the Nasdaq headline. It is also the more useful test. We tried enthusiasm before. It broke when adoption had to become infrastructure.